Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23451 - 23460 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 23451 - 23460 of 63981 for records/1000.
State v. Lee A. Sutton
treatment records. The charged assault occurred in November 1995. Sutton’s girlfriend testified that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12802 - 2005-03-31
treatment records. The charged assault occurred in November 1995. Sutton’s girlfriend testified that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12802 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sought resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831484 - 2024-07-30
sought resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831484 - 2024-07-30
[PDF]
Frontsheet
and the record are sufficient to establish that Attorney Rice violated SCR 20:8.4(c). 2 We further agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181973 - 2017-09-21
and the record are sufficient to establish that Attorney Rice violated SCR 20:8.4(c). 2 We further agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181973 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
footage from the vestibule camera is not included in the appellate record. The summary of what it shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261526 - 2020-05-21
footage from the vestibule camera is not included in the appellate record. The summary of what it shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261526 - 2020-05-21
State v. Sandra W.
result in phase one of the TPR. Based on this record, Sandra would not have succeeded in phase one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3286 - 2005-03-31
result in phase one of the TPR. Based on this record, Sandra would not have succeeded in phase one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3286 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the record; (2) improperly denied him eligibility in the challenge incarceration and earned release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43245 - 2014-09-15
with the record; (2) improperly denied him eligibility in the challenge incarceration and earned release
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43245 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
does not cite to any evidence in the record to support his explanations other than his own testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230681 - 2018-12-13
does not cite to any evidence in the record to support his explanations other than his own testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230681 - 2018-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgments and order may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122143 - 2014-09-24
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgments and order may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122143 - 2014-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factual allegations in the motion are conclusory; or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206653 - 2018-01-10
factual allegations in the motion are conclusory; or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206653 - 2018-01-10
State v. William Remington
left the officer no choice but to arrest him. Remington cites no record reference for this sweeping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15715 - 2005-03-31
left the officer no choice but to arrest him. Remington cites no record reference for this sweeping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15715 - 2005-03-31