Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23461 - 23470 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23461 - 23470 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Mary E. Schoate
court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12152 - 2017-09-21
court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12152 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott Heimermann
reviewing “[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31
reviewing “[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8548 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Greg LaFond v. David Elvig
sufficiency of the complaint is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5855 - 2017-09-19
sufficiency of the complaint is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5855 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sylvester Gordon
we review de novo. Id. The United States Supreme Court held in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13177 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. Id. The United States Supreme Court held in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13177 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Bintz
of confrontation, however, is an issue subject to de novo review. State v. Webster, 156 Wis. 2d 510, 517-22, 458
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4454 - 2017-09-19
of confrontation, however, is an issue subject to de novo review. State v. Webster, 156 Wis. 2d 510, 517-22, 458
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4454 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 91
basis is likewise an error of law, and we review de novo ‘[w]hether the [c]ity followed the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119650 - 2014-10-14
basis is likewise an error of law, and we review de novo ‘[w]hether the [c]ity followed the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119650 - 2014-10-14
[PDF]
Karen C. Martin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Accordingly, our review is de novo. See West Bend Mut. Ins. Co. v. Playman, 171 Wis. 2d 37, 40, 489 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2969 - 2017-09-19
Accordingly, our review is de novo. See West Bend Mut. Ins. Co. v. Playman, 171 Wis. 2d 37, 40, 489 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2969 - 2017-09-19
2009 WI APP 171
the application of Wis. Stat. § 70.11(4) to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41828 - 2009-11-23
the application of Wis. Stat. § 70.11(4) to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41828 - 2009-11-23
John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
of § 88.87(2), Stats. Retroactive application of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31
of § 88.87(2), Stats. Retroactive application of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Jessica M.
disagree. ¶6 Questions of statutory interpretation present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6635 - 2005-03-31
disagree. ¶6 Questions of statutory interpretation present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6635 - 2005-03-31