Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23481 - 23490 of 69285 for had.
Search results 23481 - 23490 of 69285 for had.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with respect to the CHIPs ground was whether B.T. had failed to meet the conditions in the CHIPs order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468293 - 2021-12-28
with respect to the CHIPs ground was whether B.T. had failed to meet the conditions in the CHIPs order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468293 - 2021-12-28
[PDF]
Ammann and Whitney, Inc. v. Thomas Roskos
the property. Painter, who had performed work upon the property in 1976 and 1988, immediately reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7945 - 2017-09-19
the property. Painter, who had performed work upon the property in 1976 and 1988, immediately reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7945 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. In mandamus terms, the Meises argue that the condemnation commission had a clear, plain legal duty to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51818 - 2014-09-15
. In mandamus terms, the Meises argue that the condemnation commission had a clear, plain legal duty to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51818 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
about answers or make something up, when asked what the social worker had for breakfast, the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96349 - 2013-05-06
about answers or make something up, when asked what the social worker had for breakfast, the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96349 - 2013-05-06
State v. Brian M.
had paid $130.50 in restitution. The Department’s request stated: If that court order would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6459 - 2005-03-31
had paid $130.50 in restitution. The Department’s request stated: If that court order would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6459 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and having the type of testimony that we had and his certainty to it, to compare it to what was going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54733 - 2010-09-20
and having the type of testimony that we had and his certainty to it, to compare it to what was going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54733 - 2010-09-20
Rickly Wesley v. The City of Milwaukee
that the City had to have known that they had an imperative obligation to do something. Thus, we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11700 - 2005-03-31
that the City had to have known that they had an imperative obligation to do something. Thus, we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11700 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lorne Demars
confirmed that he had discussed the repeater enhancement with Demars. Further, Demars agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4011 - 2017-09-20
confirmed that he had discussed the repeater enhancement with Demars. Further, Demars agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4011 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
of coins, had little value, and he asserts he could not be charged with burglary of his mother’s home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99318 - 2013-07-16
of coins, had little value, and he asserts he could not be charged with burglary of his mother’s home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99318 - 2013-07-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the court a different offer on which there had been “a discussion,” and counsel asked Malm on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217835 - 2018-08-16
to the court a different offer on which there had been “a discussion,” and counsel asked Malm on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217835 - 2018-08-16