Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23491 - 23500 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
Wilcoxson’s motion was untimely because it was not filed within ten days of his arraignment as required by Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28465 - 2007-03-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
subsequently filed a motion collaterally attacking a prior OWI conviction from August 2000. In it, he argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99511 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael J. Parent
of an effort to seek attention. The trial court denied Parent’s motion, finding no legitimate reason why
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24865 - 2006-04-24

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2011-12)1 motion. The State argues on appeal that Gould’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98882 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Ardell appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen a default judgment entered against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93994 - 2014-09-15

State v. Childeric Maxy
PER CURIAM. Childeric Maxy appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion brought under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17841 - 2005-05-02

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
denying a motion to correct or vacate his sentence. He contends that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93261 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Dante Boston
-conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding a Miranda-Goodchild hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9392 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of habeas corpus and an April 2, 2021 order denying his motions for reconsideration. By order dated July
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667680 - 2023-06-13

[PDF] Horst W. Josellis v. Pace Industries, Inc.
properly denied reconsideration and properly held frivolous the reconsideration motion. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5274 - 2017-09-19