Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2351 - 2360 of 6244 for cf.

CA Blank Order
is bound by his concession. Cf. State v. Scherreiks, 153 Wis. 2d 510, 518, 451 N.W.2d 759 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98465 - 2013-06-20

State v. David Gallagher
. Appeal Nos. 01-2883-CR 02-0378-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-286 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4928 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
in determining the duty to defend. Cf. State v. Clark, 179 Wis. 2d 484, 493, 507 N.W.2d 172 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27075 - 2006-11-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Cf. State v. Peete, 185 Wis.2d 4, 21, 517 N.W.2d 149 (1994) (explaining that when the State alleges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646849 - 2023-04-25

[PDF] State v. Dimitri Henley
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2768-CR Cir. Ct. No. 98-CF-486 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4490 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
not constitute divisible marital income. See Metz, 215 Wis. 2d at 633-34; cf. Weis v. Weis, 215 Wis. 2d 135, 572
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45974 - 2010-01-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they viewed T.P.’s claim with skepticism—does not prove untruthfulness. Cf. id., ¶40 (fact that accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212270 - 2018-05-09

State v. Lawrence P. Hoffman
. Appeal No. 01-2740-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-307 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4483 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gregg S. Pate
, and defendants cannot cite that later as a basis to reopen the case. Cf. State v. Weidner, 47 Wis.2d 321, 328
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13431 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rickey V. Gray
. Appeal No. 02-1839-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01-CF-1427 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5459 - 2005-03-31