Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2351 - 2360 of 70109 for his.
Search results 2351 - 2360 of 70109 for his.
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Antoine B. Lee, pro se, appeals a judgment entered upon his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103706 - 2013-11-04
and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Antoine B. Lee, pro se, appeals a judgment entered upon his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103706 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
State v. Dann P. Knippel
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence underlying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11164 - 2017-09-19
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence underlying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11164 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert S. Martinez
challenges an order denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood test showing a 0.142% blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3173 - 2017-09-19
challenges an order denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood test showing a 0.142% blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3173 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court denying his postconviction motion for resentencing without a hearing. For the reasons set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796929 - 2024-05-07
court denying his postconviction motion for resentencing without a hearing. For the reasons set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796929 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
GUNDRUM, J. 1 D.L.L. appeals from the juvenile court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227127 - 2018-11-21
GUNDRUM, J. 1 D.L.L. appeals from the juvenile court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227127 - 2018-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192389 - 2017-09-21
presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192389 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, pro se, appeals a judgment entered upon his guilty pleas to one count of armed robbery and one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103706 - 2017-09-21
, pro se, appeals a judgment entered upon his guilty pleas to one count of armed robbery and one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103706 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
order denying his plea withdrawal motion.[1] The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35938 - 2009-03-23
order denying his plea withdrawal motion.[1] The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35938 - 2009-03-23
State v. Deshawn Rodgers
appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to modify his sentence. Rodgers claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9683 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to modify his sentence. Rodgers claims: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9683 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dann P. Knippel
. Knippel argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence underlying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31
. Knippel argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence underlying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31