Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23501 - 23510 of 83320 for case search.
Search results 23501 - 23510 of 83320 for case search.
[PDF]
Review-Memo
- 1 - WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES OCTOBER 2024 The cases listed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855843 - 2024-09-23
- 1 - WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES OCTOBER 2024 The cases listed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855843 - 2024-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Poston
1 The underlying case was Milwaukee County Circuit Court case number F-880031. A copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12669 - 2017-09-21
1 The underlying case was Milwaukee County Circuit Court case number F-880031. A copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15
State v. Percy Ray Morgan
with the sentence to the intensive sanctions program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16071 - 2005-03-31
with the sentence to the intensive sanctions program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16071 - 2005-03-31
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
________________________________________________________________________ ISSUES 1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39804 - 2009-08-17
________________________________________________________________________ ISSUES 1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39804 - 2009-08-17
State v. Tony L. Gadicke
to recall the victim to the stand, near the end of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6316 - 2005-03-31
to recall the victim to the stand, near the end of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6316 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Julie Dixon
2 applicable law and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
2 applicable law and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. Warren Slocum has again appealed the same underlying case. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185294 - 2017-09-21
, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. Warren Slocum has again appealed the same underlying case. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Outagamie County Circuit Court case No. 2016CF719
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245425 - 2019-08-20
are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Outagamie County Circuit Court case No. 2016CF719
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245425 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had not established a proper measure of damages. The Laufers argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14080 - 2014-09-15
of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had not established a proper measure of damages. The Laufers argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14080 - 2014-09-15