Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23511 - 23520 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 23511 - 23520 of 83344 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Percy Ray Morgan
program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part of this statute. The sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16071 - 2017-09-21
program. The sentence imposed in this case does not violate any part of this statute. The sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16071 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2012AP2524-CR 2 both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his prior OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100149 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2012AP2524-CR 2 both cases by rejecting his collateral attack on three of his prior OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100149 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. Warren Slocum has again appealed the same underlying case. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185294 - 2017-09-21
, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ. Warren Slocum has again appealed the same underlying case. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Outagamie County Circuit Court case No. 2016CF719
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245425 - 2019-08-20
are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. In Outagamie County Circuit Court case No. 2016CF719
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245425 - 2019-08-20
Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
for reconsideration. The court dismissed the action at the conclusion of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration. The court dismissed the action at the conclusion of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kevin A. Laufer v. Town of Merton
of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had not established a proper measure of damages. The Laufers argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14080 - 2014-09-15
of the Laufers’ case, finding that they had not established a proper measure of damages. The Laufers argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14080 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP1781 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18
Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. James E. Doyle
seven justices are now available to hear the case. Finally, the issuance of the Panzer decision may
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1238 - 2004-11-03
seven justices are now available to hear the case. Finally, the issuance of the Panzer decision may
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1238 - 2004-11-03
State v. Tony L. Gadicke
to recall the victim to the stand, near the end of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6316 - 2005-03-31
to recall the victim to the stand, near the end of the defense case, because counsel had forgotten during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6316 - 2005-03-31