Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23511 - 23520 of 69007 for had.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
amount would be $7,500. Polonec testified he had been offered $7,000 for Harold. Polonec also testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27769 - 2007-01-16

COURT OF APPEALS
the intersection and returned to his lane of travel. Kramer continued on the highway at the slower speed he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37712 - 2009-07-21

Eddie D. Cannon v. James P. Murphy
found that Cannon had failed to meet his burden of proof to establish a prima facie case for a First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7824 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert B. Frier
had only minimally participated in treatment during his commitment, and had not appreciably benefited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5377 - 2005-03-31

Neal A. Johnson v. David H. Schwarz
chemicals. His previous parole had been revoked because of allegations that he battered his girlfriend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11502 - 2005-03-31

State v. Adam J. Kestell
that the officer had probable cause to search Kestell’s vehicle, we need not determine whether Kestell’s consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7627 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Tony L Sutton
on the facts alleged. The prosecutor informed the court that the parties had agreed to an amended charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11678 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Inc. v. Florence A. LaDuke
receiving $21,000. Consequently the heirs sought refund of one-half the amount Block had already retained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14999 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
). At the plea hearing the circuit court asked Padilla whether he had confessed to police. The court was made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114779 - 2014-06-17

[PDF] State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
, with work- release and child-care privileges. Oestreich had argued for less or no jail time. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12108 - 2017-09-21