Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23521 - 23530 of 29828 for des.
Search results 23521 - 23530 of 29828 for des.
State v. Tony Nollie
. Whether a crime is amenable to the privilege of self-defense is a question of law, which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16364 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a crime is amenable to the privilege of self-defense is a question of law, which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16364 - 2005-03-31
Ambrose H. Wilger v. Dodge County Planning and Development Department
these definitions, reviewing de novo the board’s implied decision accepting them. This ignores the very definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14135 - 2014-07-07
these definitions, reviewing de novo the board’s implied decision accepting them. This ignores the very definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14135 - 2014-07-07
Herbert M. Schauer v. Matthew S. Baker
a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5392 - 2007-03-19
a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5392 - 2007-03-19
State v. Andrew J. K.
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24967 - 2006-06-27
State v. Daniel T. Shea
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-11-28
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2013-12-08
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2013-12-08
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2025AP2121- OA Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1057534 - 2025-12-29
. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2025AP2121- OA Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1057534 - 2025-12-29
State v. Dayna L. Lord
presents a question of law reviewed de novo. Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13522 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law reviewed de novo. Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13522 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth J. Murray v. City of Milwaukee
apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
apply the same methodology as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3493 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
cites a handful of cases in aid of his position that five of his claims should be reviewed de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92341 - 2013-01-28
cites a handful of cases in aid of his position that five of his claims should be reviewed de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92341 - 2013-01-28