Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23521 - 23530 of 65194 for or b.
Search results 23521 - 23530 of 65194 for or b.
Metropolitan Milwaukee Fair Housing Council v. The Hartford Times Press
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Washington County: JAMES B. SCHWALBACH, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10043 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Washington County: JAMES B. SCHWALBACH, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10043 - 2005-03-31
State v. James M. Baldauf
for disorderly conduct.” Id. The court further reasoned, “[b]ecause the prohibition to possessing a firearm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5079 - 2005-03-31
for disorderly conduct.” Id. The court further reasoned, “[b]ecause the prohibition to possessing a firearm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5079 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
the seriousness of the offense, see Wis. Stat. § 938.18(5)(b), and Cecil’s role: Do I think Cecil expected Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
the seriousness of the offense, see Wis. Stat. § 938.18(5)(b), and Cecil’s role: Do I think Cecil expected Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stacey R.W.
with understanding of the nature of the acts alleged in the petition and the potential dispositions. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3132 - 2017-09-19
with understanding of the nature of the acts alleged in the petition and the potential dispositions. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3132 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in possession of a firearm as a repeat offender, see Wis. Stat. §§ 941.29(2) & 939.62(1)(b), and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28
in possession of a firearm as a repeat offender, see Wis. Stat. §§ 941.29(2) & 939.62(1)(b), and the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28
State v. Major C. Latimer
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: sarah b. o’brien, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: sarah b. o’brien, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Robert W. Burch, Jr.
)(a) and (b), Stats. Burch argues that the trial court erred by finding that Burch, when encountered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and (b), Stats. Burch argues that the trial court erred by finding that Burch, when encountered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Peschke’s postconviction motion to vacate the DNA surcharge. See Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b) (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146730 - 2015-08-17
Peschke’s postconviction motion to vacate the DNA surcharge. See Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b) (2013-14).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146730 - 2015-08-17
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Christophel
from a judgment of conviction is to comply with WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(b): “Within 20 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4156 - 2017-09-20
from a judgment of conviction is to comply with WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(b): “Within 20 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4156 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jackie C.
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(e). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5342 - 2005-03-31
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(e). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5342 - 2005-03-31