Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23521 - 23530 of 64055 for records/1000.
Search results 23521 - 23530 of 64055 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
criminal record of a prosecution witness which is known to the district attorney.” Sec. 971.23(1)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334390 - 2021-02-17
criminal record of a prosecution witness which is known to the district attorney.” Sec. 971.23(1)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334390 - 2021-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109568 - 2014-03-26
be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109568 - 2014-03-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. We have reviewed counsel’s no-merit report and we have independently reviewed the record. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95072 - 2014-09-15
. We have reviewed counsel’s no-merit report and we have independently reviewed the record. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95072 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Julian Lopez
. 2d at 792, 440 N.W.2d at 327. ¶17 At the outset, we note that the record belies Julian Lopez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6675 - 2017-09-20
. 2d at 792, 440 N.W.2d at 327. ¶17 At the outset, we note that the record belies Julian Lopez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6675 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, as the record shows that he and his trial counsel discussed but rejected such a defense, and Farley does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27471 - 2014-09-15
, as the record shows that he and his trial counsel discussed but rejected such a defense, and Farley does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27471 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
the record. We agree with appellate counsel’s conclusion that an appeal would lack arguable merit, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95072 - 2013-04-02
the record. We agree with appellate counsel’s conclusion that an appeal would lack arguable merit, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95072 - 2013-04-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but without the paragraph dealing with unrecorded interrogations as the law did not require recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162275 - 2017-09-21
but without the paragraph dealing with unrecorded interrogations as the law did not require recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sylvia A. Shovers v. Gary D. Shovers
by letter dated July 31, 2002, that she be allowed to inspect Soref’s corporate records. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24778 - 2017-09-21
by letter dated July 31, 2002, that she be allowed to inspect Soref’s corporate records. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24778 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testified. The court first addressed Hansel’s motion to dismiss on the record. Elliot testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091929 - 2026-03-17
testified. The court first addressed Hansel’s motion to dismiss on the record. Elliot testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1091929 - 2026-03-17
[PDF]
Top Hat, Inc. v. Donald W. Moen
, contending the record does not support the imposition of punitive damages, and that the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17942 - 2017-09-21
, contending the record does not support the imposition of punitive damages, and that the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17942 - 2017-09-21