Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23531 - 23540 of 98536 for civil court case status online.
Search results 23531 - 23540 of 98536 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 2, 2026 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099355 - 2026-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 2, 2026 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099355 - 2026-04-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 27, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101280 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 27, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is automatic unless the driver requests a hearing within ten days of arrest, in which case the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064813 - 2026-01-23
is automatic unless the driver requests a hearing within ten days of arrest, in which case the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064813 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 1, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177515 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 1, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177515 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this case was not responsibly prosecuted.” The court concluded that the “overwhelming evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173362 - 2017-09-21
that this case was not responsibly prosecuted.” The court concluded that the “overwhelming evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court granted Schiel’s suppression motion and later dismissed the case. The State appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292025 - 2020-10-01
. The court granted Schiel’s suppression motion and later dismissed the case. The State appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292025 - 2020-10-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 3, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251850 - 2020-01-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 3, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251850 - 2020-01-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
authority to recall the case on its own. ¶2 We agree that it would have been within the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248083 - 2019-10-09
authority to recall the case on its own. ¶2 We agree that it would have been within the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248083 - 2019-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 6, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225121 - 2018-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 6, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225121 - 2018-11-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court must first determine whether the parent has made a prima facie case for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958864 - 2025-05-20
, the circuit court must first determine whether the parent has made a prima facie case for plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958864 - 2025-05-20

