Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23531 - 23540 of 43347 for legal seperation.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the circuit court cited the proper legal standard. See WIS. STAT. § 971.17(4)(d). The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770136 - 2024-02-28

State v. Dennis L. Olson
relevant to Olson’s conviction are not disputed. Therefore, whether those facts and the legal arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5619 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
), aff’d, 486 U.S. 429. The no-merit report addresses the legality of the sentence and the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109743 - 2014-03-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with a plea of guilty, and when the defendant[’]s legal [counsel] was clearly ‘ineffective.’” This court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138236 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Dennis Marth v. David A. Schwarz
of record and a logical rationale based on proper legal standards. Id. If substantial evidence support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9903 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Kahn) v. Gary R. McCaughtry
wishes in good faith to state a constitutional claim—the legal nature of which he has not stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9581 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Rusk County Department of Health and Human Services v. Leonard M. Thorson
the wrong legal standard. Because the interpretation of WIS. STAT. § 767.51(3)(e) is conclusive, we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7632 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the circuit court cited the proper legal standard. See WIS. STAT. § 971.17(4)(d). The court also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770136 - 2024-02-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by this court on a legal issue “‘establishes the law of the case and must be followed in all subsequent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216444 - 2018-08-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the motion for sentence modification is of no legal import here because our review of this question is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66789 - 2014-09-15