Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23541 - 23550 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 23541 - 23550 of 33989 for dismissal.
[PDF]
State v. Lisa A. Carter
with the motor running. See Phillips, 142 Wis.2d at 552, 419 N.W.2d at 237. The trial court dismissed the OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15
with the motor running. See Phillips, 142 Wis.2d at 552, 419 N.W.2d at 237. The trial court dismissed the OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
depositions were taken, the Clinic moved for summary judgment dismissing Evers’s complaint. In both its brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94911 - 2013-04-01
depositions were taken, the Clinic moved for summary judgment dismissing Evers’s complaint. In both its brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94911 - 2013-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be dismissed and read in, along with two additional charges in another case. The plea agreement also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925103 - 2025-03-11
be dismissed and read in, along with two additional charges in another case. The plea agreement also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925103 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
State v. Everardo A. Lopez
count of theft (No. 98-CF-181). In exchange for Lopez’s plea, the State moved to dismiss the repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3256 - 2017-09-19
count of theft (No. 98-CF-181). In exchange for Lopez’s plea, the State moved to dismiss the repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3256 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Watkins did not have a contractual right to retire under the Rule of 75 and dismissed the grievance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256036 - 2020-03-10
that Watkins did not have a contractual right to retire under the Rule of 75 and dismissed the grievance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256036 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a pro se notice of appeal, which we dismissed because, we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100034 - 2017-09-21
filed a pro se notice of appeal, which we dismissed because, we lacked jurisdiction over the appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to establish that a motion to dismiss on this basis by trial counsel would have resulted in dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575407 - 2022-10-12
to establish that a motion to dismiss on this basis by trial counsel would have resulted in dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575407 - 2022-10-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counts were dismissed and read in.1 On Counts 1, 2, and 3, the court imposed and stayed a five-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467198 - 2021-12-29
counts were dismissed and read in.1 On Counts 1, 2, and 3, the court imposed and stayed a five-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467198 - 2021-12-29
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Charles J. Hausmann
, the conspiracy charge; pursuant to the agreement, the second count of the indictment was dismissed. Hausmann
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19056 - 2005-07-18
, the conspiracy charge; pursuant to the agreement, the second count of the indictment was dismissed. Hausmann
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19056 - 2005-07-18
2010 WI APP 175
to strike for cause and defense counsel used a peremptory strike to dismiss the juror. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13
to strike for cause and defense counsel used a peremptory strike to dismiss the juror. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56998 - 2010-12-13