Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23541 - 23550 of 65137 for or b.
Search results 23541 - 23550 of 65137 for or b.
State v. Britten A.B.
] this case.” B. Sufficiency of the Evidence ¶11 Britten argues that the trial court’s “decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5297 - 2005-03-31
] this case.” B. Sufficiency of the Evidence ¶11 Britten argues that the trial court’s “decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
a different result. Rather, “[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
a different result. Rather, “[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert Koszewski v. David H. Schwarz
Koszewski’s probation. B. Polygraph Exam. ¶11 Koszewski next alleges that the ALJ and the administrator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5233 - 2017-09-19
Koszewski’s probation. B. Polygraph Exam. ¶11 Koszewski next alleges that the ALJ and the administrator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5233 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard F. Posius
alcohol content (PAC), second offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. 346.63(1)(b). He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3688 - 2017-09-19
alcohol content (PAC), second offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. 346.63(1)(b). He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3688 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] Thus, we need not reach O’Kray’s remaining arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] Thus, we need not reach O’Kray’s remaining arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan C. Rumlow
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher P. Marshall
the opposing party a recess or a continuance. (b) In addition to or in lieu of any sanction specified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4778 - 2017-09-19
the opposing party a recess or a continuance. (b) In addition to or in lieu of any sanction specified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4778 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the judge and called her a “[b]itch.” Because J.D.J.’s verbal outburst prevented the circuit court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593401 - 2022-11-23
at the judge and called her a “[b]itch.” Because J.D.J.’s verbal outburst prevented the circuit court from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593401 - 2022-11-23
[PDF]
James P. Troia v. Carrie A. Troia
County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13083 - 2017-09-21
County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13083 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The United States Supreme Court held that “[b]y holding [defendant’s] silence against her in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919928 - 2025-02-26
. The United States Supreme Court held that “[b]y holding [defendant’s] silence against her in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919928 - 2025-02-26