Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23541 - 23550 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 23541 - 23550 of 58277 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
Company, now known as Arrowood Indemnity Company (“Royal”),1 appeals from a trial court order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36586 - 2014-09-15
Company, now known as Arrowood Indemnity Company (“Royal”),1 appeals from a trial court order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36586 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of more than forty grams of cocaine with intent to deliver.[1] Fountain argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118785 - 2014-07-30
of more than forty grams of cocaine with intent to deliver.[1] Fountain argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118785 - 2014-07-30
[PDF]
John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
by stipulation. No. 98-2889 5 review of a trial court’s decision in a certiorari proceeding, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14599 - 2017-09-21
by stipulation. No. 98-2889 5 review of a trial court’s decision in a certiorari proceeding, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14599 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172523 - 2017-09-21
filed a postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Karl C. Williams v. Northern Technical Services, Inc.
of Williams was overbroad and unreasonable, and thus unenforceable. NTS argues on appeal that the trial
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9804 - 2017-09-19
of Williams was overbroad and unreasonable, and thus unenforceable. NTS argues on appeal that the trial
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9804 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Royal Indemnity Company, now known as Arrowood Indemnity Company (“Royal”),[1] appeals from a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36586 - 2009-05-26
. Royal Indemnity Company, now known as Arrowood Indemnity Company (“Royal”),[1] appeals from a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36586 - 2009-05-26
John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
. “On review of a trial court’s decision in a certiorari proceeding, our standard of review is the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31
. “On review of a trial court’s decision in a certiorari proceeding, our standard of review is the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intimidation of a witness as an act of domestic abuse. On July 20, 2015, the day set for trial, Kyle decided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226748 - 2018-11-06
intimidation of a witness as an act of domestic abuse. On July 20, 2015, the day set for trial, Kyle decided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226748 - 2018-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Linda M. Graff
contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6045 - 2017-09-19
contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence on grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6045 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. He contends that he is entitled to a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003792 - 2025-09-03
for postconviction relief. He contends that he is entitled to a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003792 - 2025-09-03