Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23551 - 23560 of 68257 for law.

State v. Eddie L. Thomas
These issues present mixed questions of law and fact. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2015AP1792-CR 2 sixteen. The trial court ruled that the rape shield law, WIS. STAT. § 972.11(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179943 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] West End Development Corporation v. Roy's Plumbing Service, Inc.
). Although the law views default judgments with disfavor, “[e]ven if the evidence favoring a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6925 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Eddie L. Thomas
questions of law and fact. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15353 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
entitle the defendant to relief; this is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080568 - 2026-02-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and cannot be located in a manufactured home community.” The court went on to cite state and federal laws
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727118 - 2023-11-15

[PDF] Robert Skenandore v. Michael J. Sullivan
). A decision to deny parole is reviewable by common law certiorari. See State v. Goulette, 65 Wis. 2d 207
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14888 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Didion, Inc. v. Ervin Prohaska
(1) it determined as a matter of law that the parties had entered into a contract, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13348 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a governmental agency’s failure to comply with the requirements of Wisconsin’s open records law.” State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553226 - 2022-08-09

State v. Jeriline Campbell
of reasonableness is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3151 - 2005-03-31