Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23561 - 23570 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 23561 - 23570 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709303 - 2023-10-05
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709303 - 2023-10-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judge may appropriately consider them.” Id. at 46. ¶8 Nonetheless, in an appropriate case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74188 - 2014-09-15
judge may appropriately consider them.” Id. at 46. ¶8 Nonetheless, in an appropriate case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74188 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Raymond R. Chavera v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
, it was not necessary that it survey all positions in all state agencies, at least not in this case. The Commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8172 - 2017-09-19
, it was not necessary that it survey all positions in all state agencies, at least not in this case. The Commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8172 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Clifford R. Spott v. Board of Bar Examiners
2000 WI 10 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-1375-BA Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17524 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI 10 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-1375-BA Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17524 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Levelt D. Musgraves
to withdraw. We affirm. This case was here once before. Musgraves claimed that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9121 - 2017-09-19
to withdraw. We affirm. This case was here once before. Musgraves claimed that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9121 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jerry A. Foskett
1 This case is decided by a single judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997- 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2269 - 2017-09-19
1 This case is decided by a single judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997- 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2269 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1) to notify him of the State’s pretrial offer1 and (2) to properly investigate the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92944 - 2014-09-15
(1) to notify him of the State’s pretrial offer1 and (2) to properly investigate the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Horton after his case concluded, failing to argue a suppression motion, and failing to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76949 - 2014-09-15
to Horton after his case concluded, failing to argue a suppression motion, and failing to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76949 - 2014-09-15
James J. Kaufman v. Thomas E. Karlen
2005 WI App 14 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-0394 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7302 - 2005-03-31
2005 WI App 14 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-0394 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7302 - 2005-03-31
State v. Francisco Mata
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9054 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9054 - 2005-03-31