Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23571 - 23580 of 83447 for case code.
Search results 23571 - 23580 of 83447 for case code.
State v. Harris D. Byers
that (1) the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to take a plea in a ch. 980 case; (2) if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2273 - 2005-03-31
that (1) the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to take a plea in a ch. 980 case; (2) if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2273 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harris D. Byers
that (1) the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to take a plea in a ch. 980 case; (2) if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31
that (1) the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to take a plea in a ch. 980 case; (2) if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrick L. Madlock
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2718-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2718-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935377 - 2025-04-01
. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935377 - 2025-04-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the issues in this case. Additional relevant facts will be included in our discussion. BACKGROUND ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208500 - 2018-02-20
the issues in this case. Additional relevant facts will be included in our discussion. BACKGROUND ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208500 - 2018-02-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
two of Zwiacher’s cases. The MPCC had flagged them as Level III cases, meaning that “most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35766 - 2014-09-15
two of Zwiacher’s cases. The MPCC had flagged them as Level III cases, meaning that “most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35766 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a per se exigency justifying a warrantless blood draw in an OWI case. However, Thom argued Bohling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121152 - 2015-02-18
a per se exigency justifying a warrantless blood draw in an OWI case. However, Thom argued Bohling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121152 - 2015-02-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was born in 2006. The parties separated in April 2010. Prior to the filing of the divorce case, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102716 - 2017-09-21
was born in 2006. The parties separated in April 2010. Prior to the filing of the divorce case, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102716 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andre L. Avery
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2873-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11530 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2873-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11530 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Phillip Green
at 111. In this case, however, the record does not substantiate Green's allegation that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11642 - 2017-09-19
at 111. In this case, however, the record does not substantiate Green's allegation that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11642 - 2017-09-19