Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23571 - 23580 of 59362 for do.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. In addition, the Gilbertsons do not attempt to refute Fidelity’s argument that its fax did not satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27815 - 2007-01-16

COURT OF APPEALS
that J.N.B. is a danger to himself, I do not consider whether the evidence is sufficient to find that J.N.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138426 - 2015-03-25

Mack Seay v. Del Gardner
not due, and the December rent, or vacate the premises. When the Gardners again failed to do either, Seay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7971 - 2005-03-31

State v. Roger F. Lewis
or not they apply to the particular suspect, and to do so in the very words of the implied consent law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9990 - 2005-03-31

State v. Enrique Vizcaino
inside the vehicle do not reasonably suggest criminal activity.[4] However, the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25988 - 2006-07-25

Michael Van Ess v. Department of Natural Resources
surveys which includes staying in waters that are less than 6-foot of depth. We do that type of survey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9394 - 2005-03-31

Fond du Lac County DSS v. Tracey D. R.
multiday hearing. We do agree, however, that this circumstance presents a novel factual situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25763 - 2006-07-04

COURT OF APPEALS
safety for [Thoms] to investigate further and do a patdown. And then it was clearly reasonable once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84178 - 2012-07-05

[PDF] NOTICE
income than Barry each month. We do not see how fairness would require that Patti have more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37031 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert T. Sankovich
rule. We do not interpret DeFillippo as creating a “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12866 - 2005-03-31