Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23581 - 23590 of 30245 for de.

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 808.04(7m) is unconstitutional as applied to Larry. We review the constitutionality of statutes de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73058 - 2012-01-22

WI App 31 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP827-CR Complete Title ...
a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137612 - 2015-04-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Fuchsgruber v. Custom Accessories, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142990 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Century 21 - Olympia, Inc. v. Jeffrey J. Chayer
Century 21 is entitled to fees de novo. Id. ¶9 To the extent a party is entitled to attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4052 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
of historical fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Then, based on those facts, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44227 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a breach of contract is a legal issue we review de novo.” Id. Here, the court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225117 - 2018-10-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
applied a proper legal standard when it awarded damages is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336112 - 2021-02-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. Based on those facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231518 - 2019-01-02

[PDF] State v. Dennis R. Thiel
these issues de novo. State v. Smith, 229 Wis. 2d 720, 724, 600 N.W.2d 258 (Ct. App. 1999). No. 00
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2156 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler and Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159432 - 2017-09-21