Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23581 - 23590 of 68285 for law.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
or cross-appeal was without any reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported by a good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a governmental agency’s failure to comply with the requirements of Wisconsin’s open records law.” State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553226 - 2022-08-09

State v. Thomas F. Fetzner
pass statutory or constitutional muster is a question of law that this court reviews independently. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3806 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony Harris
to complain.[2] Whether Harris may challenge the lawfulness of the stop of the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9175 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
advised the administrative law judge (ALJ) that he needed time to review a packet of additional police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102596 - 2013-10-02

[PDF] Appeal No. 2006AP974-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CF131
in duration by the officer’s controlled substance investigation. Although federal and Wisconsin case law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28662 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Seventh & Michigan Partnership v. Sidney Spector
, as a matter of law, it concluded that the lease was ambiguous, determined the intent of the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8842 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Interpretation of an insurance contract is also a question of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168664 - 2017-09-21

State v. Robert W. Gossar
as a matter of law during his postconviction motion when it found that he had not established a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14311 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
the twelve-person jury panel issue because the law at the time required the six-person jury panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31