Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23581 - 23590 of 63609 for records/1000.

State v. Shannon C. Krause
, for the record, I would like to object on behalf of the State.” Not only was the objection general, failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15861 - 2005-03-31

City of Racine v. Robert Robinson
trial and instead seeking a review of the forfeiture judgment based on the record of the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9113 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jewel C.
-correcting court” and reviews the record to address any alleged “errors” of the trial court. Cook v. Cook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Njari Crosby v. James H. Anderson
decision if the trial court considers relevant facts of record, applies the correct legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7514 - 2017-09-19

James Lewis Small, Jr. v. Wtmj Television Station
the record to determine whether any material fact is in dispute. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8728 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132252 - 2014-12-29

[PDF] MuniView Newsletter August 1999
, and ordinance violation case files, court records, and minute records HAS BEEN REDUCED from six to five years
/courts/municipal/muniview/aug99.pdf - 2009-11-16

[PDF] WCCA Oversight Committee recommendations: Action plan
recommendations related to the electronic access to circuit court records. This document summarizes the actions
/courts/committees/docs/wccaactionplan2017.pdf - 2017-12-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
placement order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804986 - 2024-05-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747453 - 2024-01-04