Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23591 - 23600 of 31392 for SUBPEONA FORM.

COURT OF APPEALS
treatment both in the -- in the probationary count and treatment in the form of the Day Reporting count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143725 - 2015-06-29

COURT OF APPEALS
and 309.05. The general rule, however, is that a statute or administrative rule cannot form the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91216 - 2013-01-02

[PDF] County of Green Lake v. Clinton L. Duhm
tips from known informants, they can nonetheless form the basis for reasonable suspicion if, suitably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6056 - 2017-09-19

James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
in the trial court are not the same issues raised here, and second, Cook’s brief is totally improper in form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13175 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
not be affected by any defect or imperfection in matters of form which do not prejudice defendant). ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59313 - 2011-01-24

Richard Pierce v. Gary Norwick
. These two suits were consolidated and tried to a jury. Using a special verdict form, the jury concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10216 - 2005-03-31

County of Green v. Sherrie L. Zuber
of the incident form the basis for a reasonable suspicion but should not, in the absence of a field sobriety test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15075 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dean A. Molzner
form the basis for manifest injustice under the standards set in Birts. The Molzners also argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15090 - 2005-03-31

State v. Geraldine A. Molzner
form the basis for manifest injustice under the standards set in Birts. The Molzners also argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15091 - 2005-03-31

State v. Curtis L. Levy, Jr.
, this case comes to us in the form of an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim. This court follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17649 - 2005-04-11