Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23591 - 23600 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 23591 - 23600 of 69399 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
programs. Worzalla told the administrator that he wanted S.R. to lose her license, and said that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112698 - 2014-05-21
programs. Worzalla told the administrator that he wanted S.R. to lose her license, and said that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112698 - 2014-05-21
State v. Charles Barnes
in the same general area where he had originally been stopped. Suspicious of Cathey's activities, Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9311 - 2005-03-31
in the same general area where he had originally been stopped. Suspicious of Cathey's activities, Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9311 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 29
to have had sexual contact with her. Jeffrey testified that he did not sexually assault his daughter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45999 - 2010-02-23
to have had sexual contact with her. Jeffrey testified that he did not sexually assault his daughter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45999 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Smart argues he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102446 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Smart argues he received ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102446 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel T. Shea
to prove that he acted with an intent to defraud. We disagree because § 943.38(2), Stats., does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31
to prove that he acted with an intent to defraud. We disagree because § 943.38(2), Stats., does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel for several reasons, the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102446 - 2013-09-30
argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel for several reasons, the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102446 - 2013-09-30
State v. Robert J. Flores
counts of felony murder, party to a crime, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.03 and 939.05 (2001-02).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19485 - 2005-09-06
counts of felony murder, party to a crime, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.03 and 939.05 (2001-02).[1] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19485 - 2005-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
. Nos. 02-1214, 03-0344 2 He also appeals orders denying his post-commitment motions. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5230 - 2017-09-19
. Nos. 02-1214, 03-0344 2 He also appeals orders denying his post-commitment motions. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5230 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Flores
and 939.05 (2001-02). 1 He claims that due to the ineffectiveness of his trial counsel, a manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19485 - 2017-09-21
and 939.05 (2001-02). 1 He claims that due to the ineffectiveness of his trial counsel, a manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19485 - 2017-09-21
Steven Ludwig v. Donald Dulian
officer when he resisted arrest.[1] They contend the jury’s negligence verdict should be reinstated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12500 - 2005-03-31
officer when he resisted arrest.[1] They contend the jury’s negligence verdict should be reinstated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12500 - 2005-03-31