Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23591 - 23600 of 98536 for civil court case status online.
Search results 23591 - 23600 of 98536 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 12, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249835 - 2019-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 12, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249835 - 2019-11-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to prove that a photo array was impermissibly suggestive. Id. Rather, courts undertake a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778702 - 2024-03-21
to prove that a photo array was impermissibly suggestive. Id. Rather, courts undertake a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778702 - 2024-03-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because he believed he could not appear in court without an attorney. M.R.K.’s case manager also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379743 - 2021-06-22
because he believed he could not appear in court without an attorney. M.R.K.’s case manager also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379743 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not made a prima facie case that the circuit court’s plea colloquy was defective by insufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27
not made a prima facie case that the circuit court’s plea colloquy was defective by insufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
Barbara A. Jones v. Dane County
The case was assigned to this judge on May 24, 1995, pursuant to the court's internal operating procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7680 - 2017-09-19
The case was assigned to this judge on May 24, 1995, pursuant to the court's internal operating procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7680 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546154 - 2022-07-19
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546154 - 2022-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS JI—CRIMINAL 275. ¶52 The postconviction court found that trial counsel’s theory of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665937 - 2023-06-08
WIS JI—CRIMINAL 275. ¶52 The postconviction court found that trial counsel’s theory of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665937 - 2023-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 2, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459045 - 2021-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 2, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459045 - 2021-12-02
[PDF]
Jay Vercauteren v. Rainbow Insulators, Inc.
but it was never accepted. The case was tried to the court over a two-day period, resulting in a net recovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13850 - 2014-09-15
but it was never accepted. The case was tried to the court over a two-day period, resulting in a net recovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13850 - 2014-09-15
Jay Vercauteren v. Rainbow Insulators, Inc.
849, 857 (Ct. App. 1995), an attorney-fee case, we said that even where the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13850 - 2005-03-31
849, 857 (Ct. App. 1995), an attorney-fee case, we said that even where the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13850 - 2005-03-31