Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2361 - 2370 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 2361 - 2370 of 17421 for Cost.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment entered in favor of Terry Jackson, awarding him attorney fees, costs, No. 2023AP324 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965675 - 2025-06-10
a judgment entered in favor of Terry Jackson, awarding him attorney fees, costs, No. 2023AP324 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965675 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
WI 116
also direct that the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which total $9,702.01 as of December 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55012 - 2014-09-15
also direct that the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which total $9,702.01 as of December 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55012 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, the Bank sought, among other things, “replacement costs” of the removed items totaling $45,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143539 - 2015-06-24
, the Bank sought, among other things, “replacement costs” of the removed items totaling $45,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143539 - 2015-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for retaining the noncontraband data; and (3) the circuit court did not weigh the cost of the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578371 - 2022-10-19
for retaining the noncontraband data; and (3) the circuit court did not weigh the cost of the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578371 - 2022-10-19
Delco Electronics Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
a business adds to a single product is ‘the difference between the value of the product at sale and the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14151 - 2005-03-31
a business adds to a single product is ‘the difference between the value of the product at sale and the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14151 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “replacement costs” of the removed items totaling $45,000. As a remedy for the alleged conversion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143539 - 2017-09-21
, “replacement costs” of the removed items totaling $45,000. As a remedy for the alleged conversion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143539 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
that the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which total $9,702.01 as of December 18, 2009, be paid
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55012 - 2010-09-29
that the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which total $9,702.01 as of December 18, 2009, be paid
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55012 - 2010-09-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
reverse that part of the judgment imposing costs under WIS. STAT. § 814.04 (2005-06),1 because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32142 - 2014-09-15
reverse that part of the judgment imposing costs under WIS. STAT. § 814.04 (2005-06),1 because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32142 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rules petition 07-12
or disposing of a case in a cost effective manner. The standard of technology today allows judges to create
/supreme/docs/0712petition.pdf - 2010-01-20
or disposing of a case in a cost effective manner. The standard of technology today allows judges to create
/supreme/docs/0712petition.pdf - 2010-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
and costs on its § 100.18 claim, on which the County had prevailed in a jury trial. ¶3 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68025 - 2011-07-13
and costs on its § 100.18 claim, on which the County had prevailed in a jury trial. ¶3 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68025 - 2011-07-13