Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2361 - 2370 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2361 - 2370 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the circuit court and decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29897 - 2007-08-07
reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the circuit court and decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29897 - 2007-08-07
Thomas Derse v. Leonard Hodera
802.08(2), Stats. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8075 - 2005-03-31
802.08(2), Stats. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8075 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the issue of whether a sentence violates a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115008 - 2017-09-21
, the issue of whether a sentence violates a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115008 - 2017-09-21
Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
in this appeal. Vicki appealed to the circuit court for a de novo review. The circuit court affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15887 - 2005-03-31
in this appeal. Vicki appealed to the circuit court for a de novo review. The circuit court affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the maintenance order for the period October 1, 2008, to July 1, 2009. We conclude this issue is de minimus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52029 - 2014-09-15
in the maintenance order for the period October 1, 2008, to July 1, 2009. We conclude this issue is de minimus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52029 - 2014-09-15
State v. Cleveland Brown
of constitutional fact. Id., ¶5. The appellate court reviews questions of constitutional fact under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19345 - 2005-08-22
of constitutional fact. Id., ¶5. The appellate court reviews questions of constitutional fact under a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19345 - 2005-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court seemed to de-emphasize the incident. When addressing the custody issue, the court stated: “So I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31654 - 2008-01-28
, the court seemed to de-emphasize the incident. When addressing the custody issue, the court stated: “So I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31654 - 2008-01-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with 3 Agne’s opening brief incorrectly states that our standard of review is de novo, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211864 - 2018-04-24
with 3 Agne’s opening brief incorrectly states that our standard of review is de novo, arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211864 - 2018-04-24
Lisa K. Lepak v. Bryan D. Johnvin
is de novo. We apply the standards set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., in the same manner as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8656 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. We apply the standards set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., in the same manner as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
agreed with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
agreed with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21