Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2361 - 2370 of 9124 for op.
Search results 2361 - 2370 of 9124 for op.
State v. Israel Saldana
a defendant should accept or reject a plea bargain. See State v. Fritz, No. 96-1905-CR, slip op. at 8 (Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11532 - 2005-03-31
a defendant should accept or reject a plea bargain. See State v. Fritz, No. 96-1905-CR, slip op. at 8 (Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
brief, so he is deemed to have conceded the State’s argument. See United Co-op. v. Frontier FS Co-op
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640214 - 2023-04-04
brief, so he is deemed to have conceded the State’s argument. See United Co-op. v. Frontier FS Co-op
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640214 - 2023-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
, unpublished slip op. and order (WI App July 15, 2003). Powell’s petition for review was denied. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89199 - 2012-11-13
, unpublished slip op. and order (WI App July 15, 2003). Powell’s petition for review was denied. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89199 - 2012-11-13
Reuben Adams v. Phillip G. Macht
was not prohibited by statute. See Adams v. Macht, No. 98-3643, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Sept. 29, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2412 - 2005-03-31
was not prohibited by statute. See Adams v. Macht, No. 98-3643, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. Sept. 29, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2412 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was fully explored at trial[.]” See State v. Kennedy, No. 2003AP3212, unpublished slip op. ¶32 (WI App Nov
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81586 - 2012-04-30
was fully explored at trial[.]” See State v. Kennedy, No. 2003AP3212, unpublished slip op. ¶32 (WI App Nov
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81586 - 2012-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the verdict. State v. Ingram, No. 2014AP356-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Nov. 26, 2014). We affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21
the verdict. State v. Ingram, No. 2014AP356-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Nov. 26, 2014). We affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the confirmation of sale. See Moser v. Anchor Bank FSB, No. 2012AP2700, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144190 - 2017-09-21
to the confirmation of sale. See Moser v. Anchor Bank FSB, No. 2012AP2700, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144190 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
here. See State v. Scolman, No. 2007AP2682-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶¶2–4 (WI App Oct. 2, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
here. See State v. Scolman, No. 2007AP2682-CR, unpublished slip op. ¶¶2–4 (WI App Oct. 2, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
Wi App 127 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP6 Complete Title of...
. Melody P.M., No. 2009AP2994, unpublished slip op. ¶¶4-7 (WI App June 10, 2010). We herein interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129267 - 2014-12-18
. Melody P.M., No. 2009AP2994, unpublished slip op. ¶¶4-7 (WI App June 10, 2010). We herein interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129267 - 2014-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2010AP1294-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App April 26, 2011). ¶4 In affirming the conviction, we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106336 - 2017-09-21
, No. 2010AP1294-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App April 26, 2011). ¶4 In affirming the conviction, we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106336 - 2017-09-21