Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23601 - 23610 of 29823 for des.

State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
of this claim is de novo based on the trial court’s findings of historical facts. State v. Borhegyi, 222 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2760 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to interpret and apply condemnation statutes to undisputed facts. This is a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36258 - 2009-04-22

State v. Jerome G. Semrau
statute. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14850 - 2005-03-31

Jason Ritzel v. Wausau Business Insurance Company
of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Stipetich v. Grosshans, 2000 WI App 100, ¶10, 235
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3423 - 2005-03-31

2011 WI APP 49
therefore apply de novo review. DISCUSSION ¶18 Wisconsin Stat. § 111.70(1)(a) of MERA imposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60745 - 2011-04-19

State v. Sarah R.P.
questions of law. The standard of review is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2890 - 2013-03-26

WI App 123 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2513-CR Complete Titl...
, however, is a matter that we review de novo. State v. Yang, 2006 WI App 48, ¶10, 290 Wis. 2d 235, 243, 712
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101433 - 2013-10-29

Brakebush Brothers, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Accordingly, we are not bound by LIRC’s legal conclusions and review them de novo. Kelley Co., Inc. v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17059 - 2005-03-31

State v. Derek Miller
determination because the interpretation of a statute is a legal issue. Therefore, we will review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13618 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
court’s findings of fact are binding on us unless clearly erroneous. Under our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27492 - 2006-12-18