Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23601 - 23610 of 63935 for records/1000.
Search results 23601 - 23610 of 63935 for records/1000.
State v. Leon J. Lace
-the-record discussion with one of the State’s witnesses, Tamitha King, about possible threats: Before going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19446 - 2005-08-29
-the-record discussion with one of the State’s witnesses, Tamitha King, about possible threats: Before going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19446 - 2005-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the record reflects that the City did not seek to offset current or ongoing worker’s compensation payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078803 - 2026-02-17
, the record reflects that the City did not seek to offset current or ongoing worker’s compensation payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078803 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 Although the record in this case is not as detailed as we would like, it is adequate to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932342 - 2025-03-25
2 Although the record in this case is not as detailed as we would like, it is adequate to affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932342 - 2025-03-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
removed an existing purge term (that he produce certain business records) and added a “new” purge term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32214 - 2014-09-15
removed an existing purge term (that he produce certain business records) and added a “new” purge term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32214 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shoua Y.
of the criteria under § 48.18(5). Id. We look to the record to see whether discretion was exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10689 - 2005-03-31
of the criteria under § 48.18(5). Id. We look to the record to see whether discretion was exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10689 - 2005-03-31
Top Hat, Inc. v. Donald W. Moen
negligent.[2] Finally, he challenges the amount of the award, contending the record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17942 - 2005-05-02
negligent.[2] Finally, he challenges the amount of the award, contending the record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17942 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
, as the record shows that he and his trial counsel discussed but rejected such a defense, and Farley does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27471 - 2014-09-15
, as the record shows that he and his trial counsel discussed but rejected such a defense, and Farley does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27471 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Julian Lopez
. 2d at 792, 440 N.W.2d at 327. ¶17 At the outset, we note that the record belies Julian Lopez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6675 - 2017-09-20
. 2d at 792, 440 N.W.2d at 327. ¶17 At the outset, we note that the record belies Julian Lopez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6675 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was “dangerous because there is a substantial likelihood, based on [her] treatment record, that [she] would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993154 - 2025-08-06
was “dangerous because there is a substantial likelihood, based on [her] treatment record, that [she] would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993154 - 2025-08-06
State v. Pablo Parrilla
he did not receive a fair and impartial trial, concluding that “there is no indication in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25829 - 2006-08-29
he did not receive a fair and impartial trial, concluding that “there is no indication in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25829 - 2006-08-29