Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23601 - 23610 of 38343 for t's.
Search results 23601 - 23610 of 38343 for t's.
State v. Andrea M. White
the victims or the defendants personally. He advised the court that "[t]his matter is being handled just like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9639 - 2005-03-31
the victims or the defendants personally. He advised the court that "[t]his matter is being handled just like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9639 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984) (“[T]here is no reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63723 - 2011-05-09
assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984) (“[T]here is no reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63723 - 2011-05-09
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that “[t]here is nothing in the court evidence list, the police report, or any attorney discovery files
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
that “[t]here is nothing in the court evidence list, the police report, or any attorney discovery files
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that “[t]here is nothing in the court evidence list, the police report, or any attorney discovery files
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
that “[t]here is nothing in the court evidence list, the police report, or any attorney discovery files
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
State v. Kenneth E. Hanson
test. The probabilities with which it deals are not technical: "[T]hey are the factual and practical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31
test. The probabilities with which it deals are not technical: "[T]hey are the factual and practical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This is very common.” Consequently, the State disputes Crosby’s claim that “[t]here was no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
. This is very common.” Consequently, the State disputes Crosby’s claim that “[t]here was no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059484 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court stated: [T]he evidence was that the fingerprint was taken from the white chair beneath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197352 - 2017-10-04
court stated: [T]he evidence was that the fingerprint was taken from the white chair beneath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197352 - 2017-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2018-09-19T09:28:05-0500 CCAP-CDS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219529 - 2018-09-19
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals 2018-09-19T09:28:05-0500 CCAP-CDS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219529 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
and to the count two sentence. The trial court, in denying sentence credit initially, explained that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44845 - 2014-09-15
and to the count two sentence. The trial court, in denying sentence credit initially, explained that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44845 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559435 - 2022-08-30
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559435 - 2022-08-30