Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23611 - 23620 of 29821 for des.
Search results 23611 - 23620 of 29821 for des.
State v. Alexander R. Armstrong
the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5161 - 2005-03-31
the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5161 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sebastian "Frank" Bustamante
). On appeal, we review the trial court's determination de novo. See id. A threshold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
). On appeal, we review the trial court's determination de novo. See id. A threshold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9616 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes an erroneous exercise of discretion. ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121273 - 2014-09-09
constitutes an erroneous exercise of discretion. ¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121273 - 2014-09-09
Shirley Kroening v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin
questions of law de novo without deference to the trial court. See First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. Madison, 81
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14566 - 2005-03-31
questions of law de novo without deference to the trial court. See First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. Madison, 81
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14566 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a legal issue that we review de novo. See id. ¶22 Our review of a circuit court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102333 - 2005-03-31
presents a legal issue that we review de novo. See id. ¶22 Our review of a circuit court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102333 - 2005-03-31
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Kelli B.
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v Allen M., 214 Wis. 2d 302, 313, 571 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6035 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v Allen M., 214 Wis. 2d 302, 313, 571 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6035 - 2005-03-31
Darrent Britt v. Jane Gamble
to undisputed facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243, 247, 448 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4896 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243, 247, 448 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4896 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and the statute, Wis. Stat. § 905.065 (2007-08),[2] present questions of law that we review de novo. Davis, 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44993 - 2009-12-29
and the statute, Wis. Stat. § 905.065 (2007-08),[2] present questions of law that we review de novo. Davis, 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44993 - 2009-12-29
State v. Melvin L. Moffett
. We review that conclusion de novo. See State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15719 - 2005-03-31
. We review that conclusion de novo. See State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414 N.W.2d 311 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15719 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of fact and to apply the hypothesis of innocence rule de novo to the evidence presented at her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138979 - 2015-04-06
of fact and to apply the hypothesis of innocence rule de novo to the evidence presented at her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138979 - 2015-04-06