Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23611 - 23620 of 58492 for speedy trial.

State v. Jeffrey S. Tennant
of Tennant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt by the probative and credible evidence presented at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13985 - 2005-03-31

State v. Malcolm B. Rush
a witness, following a jury trial. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6711 - 2005-03-31

AM Transportation, Inc. v. Matarah Industries, Inc.
the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment because the contract between them failed to include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2436 - 2005-03-31

Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
quoted. Praxmarer refused to pay the additional cost, and Loehrke instituted this action. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25624 - 2006-06-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, that a trial elsewhere is more convenient and more just. The court must look at a balance of certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142170 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Donald C. Lee
inability to serve a copy on the prosecution, that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8602 - 2017-09-19

Seventh & Michigan Partnership v. Sidney Spector
that the trial court erred when, as a matter of law, it concluded that the lease was ambiguous, determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8842 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that considering all the factors, that a trial elsewhere is more convenient and more just. The court must look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142170 - 2015-05-26

Lemont Gregory v. United Parcel Service
. UPS’s motion was granted and the case set for trial before the Honorable Patrick L. Snyder. After trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14670 - 2005-03-31

State v. John Konaha
for postconviction relief. Konaha argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5740 - 2005-03-31