Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23621 - 23630 of 69399 for as he.

[PDF] WI 8
of his vehicle and ordered him to drop an unknown object that he held in his hand; (2) upon retrieving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46694 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
solely on the issue of whether he possessed a meritorious claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132203 - 2014-12-25

Frontsheet
that he held in his hand; (2) upon retrieving that object, the officer recognized it as an open cell phone
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46694 - 2010-02-08

[PDF] Frontsheet
proceedings. He does not argue that he was unaware that, by pleading guilty to the criminal charges against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165775 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
of whether he possessed a meritorious claim for ineffective assistance of counsel. ¶6 While Foster's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132203 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
argues that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to argue that he had complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69124 - 2011-08-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and the order denying the supplemental § 974.06 motion he filed with the assistance of retained postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533324 - 2022-06-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel was ineffective in failing to argue that he had complied with the safety plan; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69124 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 36
for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), and he appeals from an order denying his amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212849 - 2018-09-12

[PDF] State v. Stanley A. Samuel
statement on grounds that the witness’s statement was coerced. We conclude that he did and thus reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16059 - 2017-09-21