Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23621 - 23630 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 23621 - 23630 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.
State v. C&S Management, Inc.
. The analysis applied to these forms of legislation is termed the “rational basis test” and only measures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8332 - 2005-03-31
. The analysis applied to these forms of legislation is termed the “rational basis test” and only measures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8332 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny K. Pinder
test the United States Supreme Court established in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). In Day v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25053 - 2006-05-08
test the United States Supreme Court established in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). In Day v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25053 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Tommie S. Gray
the application of a two-part test. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 135, 473 N.W.2d 164, 170 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12632 - 2017-09-21
the application of a two-part test. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 135, 473 N.W.2d 164, 170 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12632 - 2017-09-21
State v. Elijah Arrington
N.W.2d 177, 179 (1986) (citation omitted). The test is one “of minimal adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8814 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 177, 179 (1986) (citation omitted). The test is one “of minimal adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8814 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tommie S. Gray
of a two-part test. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 135, 473 N.W.2d 164, 170 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12632 - 2005-03-31
of a two-part test. See State v. Littrup, 164 Wis.2d 120, 135, 473 N.W.2d 164, 170 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12632 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jane Doe v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation
v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 719 So. 2d 210 (Ala. 1998), applied a two-part test in order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2685 - 2017-09-19
v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 719 So. 2d 210 (Ala. 1998), applied a two-part test in order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2685 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2003 WI 111, ¶20, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. That test is the same as the test applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34965 - 2008-12-22
, 2003 WI 111, ¶20, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. That test is the same as the test applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34965 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Burley Harding
either officer administered any field sobriety tests. Another State’s witness candidly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14153 - 2014-09-15
either officer administered any field sobriety tests. Another State’s witness candidly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14153 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
test for whether Wetter is entitled to reversal of his conviction: Is it “clear beyond a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27974 - 2014-09-15
test for whether Wetter is entitled to reversal of his conviction: Is it “clear beyond a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27974 - 2014-09-15
State v. James D. Paulson
. The test for a possible violator is simply the time honored and time validated reasonable person test, i.e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
. The test for a possible violator is simply the time honored and time validated reasonable person test, i.e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31