Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23651 - 23660 of 69908 for his.
Search results 23651 - 23660 of 69908 for his.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and dismissing his complaint. We affirm. ¶2 On March 9, 2007, Lacy filed a complaint in small claims court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32407 - 2014-09-15
and dismissing his complaint. We affirm. ¶2 On March 9, 2007, Lacy filed a complaint in small claims court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32407 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
, that he understands his rights to contest the allegations and to consult with and retain counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71855 - 2011-10-04
, that he understands his rights to contest the allegations and to consult with and retain counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71855 - 2011-10-04
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
by weight in blood contrary to §§ 346.63(1)(a) and (b), Stats., second offense, and orders denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9045 - 2005-03-31
by weight in blood contrary to §§ 346.63(1)(a) and (b), Stats., second offense, and orders denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9045 - 2005-03-31
State v. Paul R. Brzycki
it failed to hear his pro se motion to withdraw his plea. Because Brzycki abandoned the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7198 - 2005-03-31
it failed to hear his pro se motion to withdraw his plea. Because Brzycki abandoned the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County v. Matthew W.G.
. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. Matthew G. appeals an order for his involuntary mental commitment under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15929 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. Matthew G. appeals an order for his involuntary mental commitment under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15929 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
his motion claiming selective or vindictive prosecution. He argues that his prosecution for felon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35365 - 2014-09-15
his motion claiming selective or vindictive prosecution. He argues that his prosecution for felon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Derek W. Pfeil
substantially prejudiced him because he had to change his theory of defense and was unable to testify on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6192 - 2017-09-19
substantially prejudiced him because he had to change his theory of defense and was unable to testify on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6192 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
to practice law in Wisconsin in 1978. On May 18, 2004, this court summarily suspended his license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24518 - 2017-09-21
to practice law in Wisconsin in 1978. On May 18, 2004, this court summarily suspended his license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24518 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Matthew Buss appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12
CURIAM. Matthew Buss appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06),[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12
[PDF]
Frank Balistreri v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
-2- was ineligible for unemployment benefits after being fired from his job for violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8343 - 2017-09-19
-2- was ineligible for unemployment benefits after being fired from his job for violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8343 - 2017-09-19