Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23651 - 23660 of 57293 for id.
Search results 23651 - 23660 of 57293 for id.
State v. Charles E. Phinisee
the identity of the perpetrator.” Id. at 560, 273 N.W.2d at 313. We reject that reading of Francis, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12066 - 2005-03-31
the identity of the perpetrator.” Id. at 560, 273 N.W.2d at 313. We reject that reading of Francis, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12066 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the statute or rule.” Id. at 172-73 (citation omitted). We look to whether a person of ordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
in the statute or rule.” Id. at 172-73 (citation omitted). We look to whether a person of ordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Pender v. City of Appleton
that the exclusionary rule does not apply to civil ordinance violations. See id. at 45-46, 203 N.W.2d at 636-37. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15119 - 2017-09-21
that the exclusionary rule does not apply to civil ordinance violations. See id. at 45-46, 203 N.W.2d at 636-37. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15119 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court. Id. ¶16 To prove ineffective assistance, a defendant must show that “counsel’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32636 - 2008-05-05
court. Id. ¶16 To prove ineffective assistance, a defendant must show that “counsel’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32636 - 2008-05-05
State v. Kenyatta Thigpen
admission of statements against interest where the declarant is unavailable. See id. Here, Thigpen argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16038 - 2005-03-31
admission of statements against interest where the declarant is unavailable. See id. Here, Thigpen argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16038 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
St. Croix County v. Adam Douglas Cress
the circumstances. Id. at 810. A traffic stop is generally reasonable if the officers have grounds to reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3353 - 2017-09-19
the circumstances. Id. at 810. A traffic stop is generally reasonable if the officers have grounds to reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3353 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
,’ and the application of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208908 - 2018-02-28
,’ and the application of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208908 - 2018-02-28
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey H. Bostedt
the evidence.” Id. The prosecutor's remarks must be examined in the context of the entire trial. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14822 - 2017-09-21
the evidence.” Id. The prosecutor's remarks must be examined in the context of the entire trial. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14822 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” in the searched location. Id., ¶13. Under the facts in Secrist, there was probable cause to arrest because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130497 - 2017-09-21
” in the searched location. Id., ¶13. Under the facts in Secrist, there was probable cause to arrest because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130497 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173389 - 2017-09-21
this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173389 - 2017-09-21