Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23651 - 23660 of 57894 for id.

[PDF] NOTICE
that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41717 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. “Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280749 - 2020-08-20

[PDF] WI APP 4
, to avoid absurd or unreasonable results. Id., ¶46. ¶5 Jahnke entered a plea to the recording crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35064 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
should not have found guilt based on the evidence before it. Id., 153 Wis. 2d 493, 507, 451 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559295 - 2022-08-30

[PDF] WI APP 231
has the right to assistance of counsel for his or her defense. Id. at 2561. The Court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30168 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
moving for summary judgment. Id. ¶9 Under the summary judgment methodology, the circuit court first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202525 - 2017-11-14

[PDF] Richard T. Jasso v. Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System/Annuity and Pension Board
fairness test. See id. at 305. A court may consider some or all of the following factors when making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5758 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
of its textually manifest scope, context, and purpose. Id., ¶¶45-46. A statute is ambiguous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29552 - 2007-06-28

COURT OF APPEALS
present stronger evidence. Id. We are bound by the “any credible evidence” standard. ¶10 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36137 - 2009-04-13

wi app 89 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1363-CR Complete Title...
was not appropriate, but reiterated that it: [D]id not harbor any feelings of bias or prejudice against the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63762 - 2011-06-28