Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23651 - 23660 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 23651 - 23660 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. We reject Kerscher’s claim and affirm the orders. ¶2 In January 2008, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91734 - 2013-01-22
. We reject Kerscher’s claim and affirm the orders. ¶2 In January 2008, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91734 - 2013-01-22
State v. Bruce A. Rumage
raising the duplicity/jury unanimity claim and alleging that postconviction counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2005-03-31
raising the duplicity/jury unanimity claim and alleging that postconviction counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as aggravating factors at sentencing. ¶4 Zellmer moved for postconviction relief, pursuing claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887630 - 2024-12-11
as aggravating factors at sentencing. ¶4 Zellmer moved for postconviction relief, pursuing claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887630 - 2024-12-11
Gregory C. Royal v. Sara Seehafer
. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Gregory C. Royal appeals the dismissal of his small claims defamation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3203 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Gregory C. Royal appeals the dismissal of his small claims defamation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3203 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rebecca A. Yager v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
(LIRC). In that decision, LIRC denied Yager’s claim for worker’s compensation. The dispositive issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14396 - 2014-09-15
(LIRC). In that decision, LIRC denied Yager’s claim for worker’s compensation. The dispositive issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14396 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Carol Gonzales v. Kenosha County
are employees of the Kenosha County Jail. The underlying claim arose from the collective bargaining agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20892 - 2017-09-21
are employees of the Kenosha County Jail. The underlying claim arose from the collective bargaining agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20892 - 2017-09-21
Carol Gonzales v. Kenosha County
of the Kenosha County Jail. The underlying claim arose from the collective bargaining agreement the County had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20892 - 2006-01-10
of the Kenosha County Jail. The underlying claim arose from the collective bargaining agreement the County had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20892 - 2006-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was only fifteen years. Dantzler claimed he would not have entered his pleas if he was aware he would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444660 - 2021-10-26
was only fifteen years. Dantzler claimed he would not have entered his pleas if he was aware he would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444660 - 2021-10-26
[PDF]
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. William D. Ridgely
of his claim, and obtained an order requiring Ridgely to reprocess his request. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13269 - 2017-09-21
of his claim, and obtained an order requiring Ridgely to reprocess his request. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13269 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Dan A. Riegleman
. Attorney Riegleman filed a Worker's Compensation claim against Tennessen's employer and the employer's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16592 - 2005-03-31
. Attorney Riegleman filed a Worker's Compensation claim against Tennessen's employer and the employer's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16592 - 2005-03-31