Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23661 - 23670 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 23661 - 23670 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
request a psychological examination of the victim.”) He claims he was denied the effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32195 - 2008-03-25
request a psychological examination of the victim.”) He claims he was denied the effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32195 - 2008-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and ineffectiveness claims. The cases were consolidated for appeal. ¶7 Hand first argues that he was denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231518 - 2019-01-02
and ineffectiveness claims. The cases were consolidated for appeal. ¶7 Hand first argues that he was denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231518 - 2019-01-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims that he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel because, during cross-examination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362766 - 2021-05-04
claims that he received ineffective assistance from his trial counsel because, during cross-examination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362766 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
application for a use-variance. Barbian claims that: No. 2006AP3161 2 (1) the Board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30658 - 2014-09-15
application for a use-variance. Barbian claims that: No. 2006AP3161 2 (1) the Board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30658 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James A. Genett
excluded the testimony of his alibi witness. We reject his claims and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12618 - 2017-09-21
excluded the testimony of his alibi witness. We reject his claims and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12618 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alexander R. Armstrong
] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion. Armstrong claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5161 - 2005-03-31
] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion. Armstrong claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
would show that she had misappropriated significantly less money than alleged. Ziehli claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193851 - 2017-09-21
would show that she had misappropriated significantly less money than alleged. Ziehli claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193851 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
retaliatory discharge claim. ¶10 At various stages in the process (complaint, deposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195186 - 2017-09-21
retaliatory discharge claim. ¶10 At various stages in the process (complaint, deposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195186 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey Krohn
of burglary and from the postconviction orders reaffirming the denial of his motion to suppress. Krohn claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14816 - 2005-03-31
of burglary and from the postconviction orders reaffirming the denial of his motion to suppress. Krohn claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14816 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alexander R. Armstrong
claims: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to sever the two counts; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
claims: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to sever the two counts; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19