Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23661 - 23670 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 23661 - 23670 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. Malcolm B. Rush
a witness, following a jury trial. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6711 - 2005-03-31
a witness, following a jury trial. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6711 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Abbott
, for battery as a habitual offender, contrary to §§ 940.19(1) and 939.62, STATS. The trial court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11122 - 2017-09-19
, for battery as a habitual offender, contrary to §§ 940.19(1) and 939.62, STATS. The trial court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11122 - 2017-09-19
County of Rusk v. Eugene A. Ringhand
, including the old highway right-of-way and the strip of land in Section 32.[1] The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6959 - 2005-03-31
, including the old highway right-of-way and the strip of land in Section 32.[1] The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6959 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He contends that trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He contends that trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the jury trial on grounds and the disposition hearing at which D.J.W.’s parental rights were terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913866 - 2025-02-12
the jury trial on grounds and the disposition hearing at which D.J.W.’s parental rights were terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913866 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
failure to raise the issue in the trial court, we reverse the orders before us on appeal and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9931 - 2017-09-19
failure to raise the issue in the trial court, we reverse the orders before us on appeal and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
failure to raise the issue in the trial court, we reverse the orders before us on appeal and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9933 - 2017-09-19
failure to raise the issue in the trial court, we reverse the orders before us on appeal and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9933 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel P. Moen
-2676-CR 2 presented at trial was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4457 - 2017-09-19
-2676-CR 2 presented at trial was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4457 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Seventh & Michigan Partnership v. Sidney Spector
and Berlin cross-appeal from the judgment. Seventh & Michigan contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8842 - 2017-09-19
and Berlin cross-appeal from the judgment. Seventh & Michigan contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8842 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
No. 2006AP3020-FT 2 challenges the trial court’s method of calculating the value of the parties’ interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29102 - 2014-09-15
No. 2006AP3020-FT 2 challenges the trial court’s method of calculating the value of the parties’ interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29102 - 2014-09-15