Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23671 - 23680 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 23671 - 23680 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ. The court has considered a Motion and attached Affidavit of Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143710 - 2017-09-21
Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ. The court has considered a Motion and attached Affidavit of Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2010AP2629 2 (2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74186 - 2014-09-15
his motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2010AP2629 2 (2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74186 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727913 - 2023-11-14
contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727913 - 2023-11-14
Discovery Technologies, Inc. v. Avidcare Corporation
Discovery’s motion seeking reconsideration and granted Boaz Avitall’s motion to dismiss. Discovery makes two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7372 - 2005-03-31
Discovery’s motion seeking reconsideration and granted Boaz Avitall’s motion to dismiss. Discovery makes two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7372 - 2005-03-31
Terry Richards v. Jairo Mendivil, M.D.
as to the standard of care is not required. We reverse the trial court’s order granting Dr. Jairo Mendivil’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8549 - 2005-03-31
as to the standard of care is not required. We reverse the trial court’s order granting Dr. Jairo Mendivil’s motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8549 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rovaughn Hill
court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the criminal complaint on double jeopardy grounds.[1] Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2196 - 2005-03-31
court’s order denying his motion to dismiss the criminal complaint on double jeopardy grounds.[1] Hill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2196 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
PER CURIAM. Daniel Aguilar appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31017 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. Daniel Aguilar appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31017 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Terry Richards v. Jairo Mendivil, M.D.
motions after verdict and dismissing the complaint because a layperson can reasonably infer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8549 - 2017-09-19
motions after verdict and dismissing the complaint because a layperson can reasonably infer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8549 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Discovery Technologies, Inc. v. Avidcare Corporation
motion seeking reconsideration and granted Boaz Avitall’s motion to dismiss. Discovery makes two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7372 - 2017-09-20
motion seeking reconsideration and granted Boaz Avitall’s motion to dismiss. Discovery makes two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7372 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for dispositive motions, Amanda filed a motion to dismiss based on the following grounds: (1) Hubert did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190221 - 2017-09-21
for dispositive motions, Amanda filed a motion to dismiss based on the following grounds: (1) Hubert did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190221 - 2017-09-21