Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23671 - 23680 of 55892 for n y c.

[PDF] W.T. Corporation v. The Town of Waukesha
.† - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - No. 94-0814 ROYAL C. NEUMANN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TOWN OF WAUKESHA and TOWN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7815 - 2017-09-19

Gary J. Howell v. Orrin Denomie
argument by Robert E. Haney. For the plaintiff-respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Robert C
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18666 - 2008-10-27

State v. Daniel Goodremote II
was rejected in State v. Friedrich, 135 Wis.2d 1, 17, n.7, 398 N.W.2d 763, 770, n.7 (1987). Furthermore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12568 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
at 369 n.38. That is an understatement. The fact of the matter is that every court that has interpreted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17238 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] MuniView Newsletter December 2000
N E W S L E T T E R Vol. 2000 No. 6 December 2000
/courts/municipal/muniview/dec00.pdf - 2009-11-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Milwaukee County Appeals Processing Division Electronic Notice Teahara M. King 2417 N. 33rd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08

[PDF] NOTICE
be modified from seventeen years to ten years. ¶3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.13 states that “[i]n any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35638 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of ‘custody.’” State v. Cobb, 135 Wis. 2d 181, 185 n.5, 400 N.W.2d 9 (Ct. App. 1986). Sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27774 - 2007-01-16

[PDF] NOTICE
, 185 n.5, 400 N.W.2d 9 (Ct. App. 1986). Sentence credit is governed by WIS. STAT. § 973.155(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27774 - 2014-09-15

Leander J. Schlosser v. Terry Schlosser
to the defendant is not recoverable as unjust enrichment." Lawlis v. Thompson, 137 Wis.2d 490, 499 n.1, 405 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12255 - 2005-03-31