Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23671 - 23680 of 91507 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 23671 - 23680 of 91507 for police arresting judge 2 part.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2017-18). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2017-18). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249806 - 2019-11-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: MARK J. MCGINNIS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107406 - 2017-09-21
a judgment and order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: MARK J. MCGINNIS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107406 - 2017-09-21
State v. Luis H.
. § 938.31(2)(1995-96).[2] Three juveniles contend that the elimination of a jury trial as part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17227 - 2005-03-31
. § 938.31(2)(1995-96).[2] Three juveniles contend that the elimination of a jury trial as part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17227 - 2005-03-31
State v. Hezzie R.
. § 938.31(2)(1995-96).[2] Three juveniles contend that the elimination of a jury trial as part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17226 - 2005-03-31
. § 938.31(2)(1995-96).[2] Three juveniles contend that the elimination of a jury trial as part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17226 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan D.L.
. § 938.31(2)(1995-96).[2] Three juveniles contend that the elimination of a jury trial as part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17248 - 2005-03-31
. § 938.31(2)(1995-96).[2] Three juveniles contend that the elimination of a jury trial as part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17248 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: DENNIS R. CIMPL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79514 - 2014-09-15
: DENNIS R. CIMPL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79514 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Patrick B. Sheehan
Argument: January 8, 1999 Source of APPEAL COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: JUSTICES
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17281 - 2017-09-21
Argument: January 8, 1999 Source of APPEAL COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: JUSTICES
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17281 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
invoices for those parts. No. 2014AP896-CR 5 ¶10 David Pellett, a Menomonie police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131832 - 2017-09-21
invoices for those parts. No. 2014AP896-CR 5 ¶10 David Pellett, a Menomonie police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131832 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffrey D. Knickmeier
: Judge: Justices: Concurred: PROSSER, J., concurs. Dissented: BRADLEY, J., dissents
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16671 - 2005-03-31
: Judge: Justices: Concurred: PROSSER, J., concurs. Dissented: BRADLEY, J., dissents
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16671 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffrey D. Knickmeier
: COUNTY: JUDGE: JUSTICES: CONCURRED: PROSSER, J., concurs. DISSENTED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16671 - 2017-09-21
: COUNTY: JUDGE: JUSTICES: CONCURRED: PROSSER, J., concurs. DISSENTED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16671 - 2017-09-21