Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23681 - 23690 of 59208 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 23681 - 23690 of 59208 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. James D. Lammers
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises claims related to what he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24598 - 2006-03-28
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises claims related to what he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24598 - 2006-03-28
State v. Andre D. Mitchell
at the hearing on his suppression motion. Mitchell claims that Williams overheard the police employing improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
at the hearing on his suppression motion. Mitchell claims that Williams overheard the police employing improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motions. Haas claims that his due-process rights were violated when: (1) an out-of-court show-up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32212 - 2008-03-24
postconviction motions. Haas claims that his due-process rights were violated when: (1) an out-of-court show-up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32212 - 2008-03-24
[PDF]
Daniel J. Lenhart v. Robert L. Kisting
. They also claim that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. We affirm the judgment and reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11979 - 2017-09-21
. They also claim that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. We affirm the judgment and reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11979 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2018AP2019-CR 5 II. DISCUSSION ¶12 Sanders renews his postconviction claims on appeal. “When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246201 - 2019-09-10
2018AP2019-CR 5 II. DISCUSSION ¶12 Sanders renews his postconviction claims on appeal. “When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246201 - 2019-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
). Acuity claimed that it was entitled to subrogation from Partners because an Ironworks employee damaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27201 - 2006-11-21
). Acuity claimed that it was entitled to subrogation from Partners because an Ironworks employee damaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27201 - 2006-11-21
Stephen Boudwin v. Windjammers Sailing Club, Inc.
. It also argues that the Town is estopped from claiming it as a town road. We reject Windjammers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15398 - 2005-03-31
. It also argues that the Town is estopped from claiming it as a town road. We reject Windjammers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15398 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Martin J. Applebee
his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he is entitled to a new trial (1) because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3349 - 2017-09-19
his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he is entitled to a new trial (1) because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3349 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective. A criminal defendant must raise all available claims in the “original, supplemental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
was ineffective. A criminal defendant must raise all available claims in the “original, supplemental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906575 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
Lola M. v. City of Milwaukee
the circuit court judgment dismissing her claims against the City of Milwaukee, based on the court’s written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4082 - 2017-09-20
the circuit court judgment dismissing her claims against the City of Milwaukee, based on the court’s written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4082 - 2017-09-20