Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23681 - 23690 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 23681 - 23690 of 83278 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment in favor of Guardian Pipeline, LLC. This is one of several cases brought by landowners against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
a judgment in favor of Guardian Pipeline, LLC. This is one of several cases brought by landowners against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
misdemeanor cases), contends the trial court erred when it refused to grant him a new trial because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14461 - 2005-03-31
misdemeanor cases), contends the trial court erred when it refused to grant him a new trial because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
then file a resolution disapproving of the ordinance, in which case the ordinance will not become
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27363 - 2014-09-15
then file a resolution disapproving of the ordinance, in which case the ordinance will not become
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27363 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP1694-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2005CT184
if the case were retried, and the court’s conclusion that “equity would demand that someone … pay
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29942 - 2014-09-15
if the case were retried, and the court’s conclusion that “equity would demand that someone … pay
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29942 - 2014-09-15
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
misdemeanor cases), contends the trial court erred when it refused to grant him a new trial because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
misdemeanor cases), contends the trial court erred when it refused to grant him a new trial because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
Clifford R. Spott v. Board of Bar Examiners
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-1375-BA Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17524 - 2009-02-02
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-1375-BA Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17524 - 2009-02-02
Town of Waukesha v. City of Waukesha
decided the case on summary judgment and concluded that there were no material factual issues in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4589 - 2005-03-31
decided the case on summary judgment and concluded that there were no material factual issues in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jarmal Nelson
OPINION Case No.: 2004AP1954-CR Complete Title of Case: †Petition for review dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17755 - 2017-09-21
OPINION Case No.: 2004AP1954-CR Complete Title of Case: †Petition for review dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 54
2008 WI APP 54 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP357
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32124 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 54 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP357
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32124 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jarmal Nelson
Case No.: 2004AP1954-CR Complete Title of Case: †Petition for review dismissed. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17755 - 2005-07-06
Case No.: 2004AP1954-CR Complete Title of Case: †Petition for review dismissed. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17755 - 2005-07-06