Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23691 - 23700 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 23691 - 23700 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Randall J. Wilson v. The Estate of Elsie L. Woodford
of a 1983 real estate transaction. Randall and Miriam Wilson appeal a judgment dismissing their claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10313 - 2005-03-31
of a 1983 real estate transaction. Randall and Miriam Wilson appeal a judgment dismissing their claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10313 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that there would be no arguable merit to a claim that Ceron Peralta’s trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871850 - 2024-11-06
that there would be no arguable merit to a claim that Ceron Peralta’s trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871850 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that there would be no arguable merit to a claim that Ceron Peralta’s trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871850 - 2024-11-06
that there would be no arguable merit to a claim that Ceron Peralta’s trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871850 - 2024-11-06
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
in violation of Lacy’s rights. Lacy’s claims against him for damages under § 146.84, Stats., and 42 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
in violation of Lacy’s rights. Lacy’s claims against him for damages under § 146.84, Stats., and 42 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
further.[3] In his response Esters claims that his appellate counsel fails to consider and discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
further.[3] In his response Esters claims that his appellate counsel fails to consider and discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
State v. Darin W. Baratka
, Baratka claims that his motion for summary judgment should have been granted. ¶9 This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2005-03-31
, Baratka claims that his motion for summary judgment should have been granted. ¶9 This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. William D. Ridgely
of his claim, and obtained an order requiring Ridgely to reprocess his request. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13140 - 2017-09-21
of his claim, and obtained an order requiring Ridgely to reprocess his request. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13140 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
information in reaching its decision. Stanton claimed the PRC relied on “false information stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78137 - 2014-09-15
information in reaching its decision. Stanton claimed the PRC relied on “false information stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78137 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
claims action against Steven Czys for wrongful eviction, failure to return his security deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51829 - 2010-07-07
claims action against Steven Czys for wrongful eviction, failure to return his security deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51829 - 2010-07-07
State v. Harry L. Gant
an inadequate showing on one. Id. at 697. We address each of Gant’s claims regarding his counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2005-03-31
an inadequate showing on one. Id. at 697. We address each of Gant’s claims regarding his counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2005-03-31