Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23691 - 23700 of 58437 for speedy trial.
Search results 23691 - 23700 of 58437 for speedy trial.
David J. Winkel v. Jeanette M. Wilke
to this court instead of demanding a trial in the circuit court within ten days pursuant to § 799.207(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
to this court instead of demanding a trial in the circuit court within ten days pursuant to § 799.207(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the south wall of the foundation. They commenced this suit and a jury trial was held. At the close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57400 - 2014-09-15
the south wall of the foundation. They commenced this suit and a jury trial was held. At the close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57400 - 2014-09-15
Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
quoted. Praxmarer refused to pay the additional cost, and Loehrke instituted this action. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25624 - 2006-06-21
quoted. Praxmarer refused to pay the additional cost, and Loehrke instituted this action. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25624 - 2006-06-21
Chad Boyles v. Milwaukee County
& Landscape Architects appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing Boyles’s negligence and safe-place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2137 - 2005-03-31
& Landscape Architects appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing Boyles’s negligence and safe-place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Moore, pro se, appeals from an order denying a postconviction motion seeking a new trial. He alleges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161796 - 2017-09-21
Moore, pro se, appeals from an order denying a postconviction motion seeking a new trial. He alleges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161796 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David L. Fries
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI), § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11602 - 2017-09-19
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI), § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11602 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that considering all the factors, that a trial elsewhere is more convenient and more just. The court must look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142170 - 2015-05-26
that considering all the factors, that a trial elsewhere is more convenient and more just. The court must look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142170 - 2015-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He contends that trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He contends that trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90571 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90571 - 2014-09-15
State v. David Krause
was acting in self-defense. Krause argues, and the State agrees, that the trial court improperly instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6562 - 2011-11-13
was acting in self-defense. Krause argues, and the State agrees, that the trial court improperly instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6562 - 2011-11-13