Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2371 - 2380 of 13656 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
Search results 2371 - 2380 of 13656 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
State v. Billy J. Doudna
the guarantee of equal protection and subjects him to double jeopardy. We reject each claim and affirm. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
the guarantee of equal protection and subjects him to double jeopardy. We reject each claim and affirm. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report alleging: (1) a double jeopardy violation; (2) judicial bias at sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737176 - 2023-12-05
to the no-merit report alleging: (1) a double jeopardy violation; (2) judicial bias at sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737176 - 2023-12-05
[PDF]
Gail Ann Ernst v. Samuel Adolph Ernst
to give due regard to the assets he brought to the marriage, that the trial court double counted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9001 - 2017-09-19
to give due regard to the assets he brought to the marriage, that the trial court double counted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9001 - 2017-09-19
Gregory W. Schaefer v. Barbara Conway
that she and Gregory vacationed together. [5] Gregory’s assertion that he is entitled to double damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2005-10-25
that she and Gregory vacationed together. [5] Gregory’s assertion that he is entitled to double damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20047 - 2005-10-25
COURT OF APPEALS
reconfinement order violated Bowers’s equal protection rights and improperly subjected him to double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
reconfinement order violated Bowers’s equal protection rights and improperly subjected him to double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Debra L. Van Riper
and read in for purposes of sentencing. Because Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
and read in for purposes of sentencing. Because Van Riper was a repeater, the penalty enhancer doubled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13283 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
onto South Albert Avenue. The officer saw the vehicle cross about two or three feet over the double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31273 - 2014-09-15
onto South Albert Avenue. The officer saw the vehicle cross about two or three feet over the double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31273 - 2014-09-15
Stephanie K. Kalnes v. Julie Monnier
, the trial court awarded Kalnes double her pecuniary loss, plus costs, plus attorney's fees, pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9465 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court awarded Kalnes double her pecuniary loss, plus costs, plus attorney's fees, pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9465 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
126, ¶11, 254 Wis. 2d 789, 646 N.W.2d 53 (regarding an exception for double jeopardy claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
126, ¶11, 254 Wis. 2d 789, 646 N.W.2d 53 (regarding an exception for double jeopardy claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
double damages, or $6800, attorney’s fees, and costs. ¶8 Katia answered, and then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108400 - 2017-09-21
double damages, or $6800, attorney’s fees, and costs. ¶8 Katia answered, and then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108400 - 2017-09-21